Remittances fuel consumption, not growth
In the Washington Post, Marcela Sanchez takes a look at the two-edged sword of Salvadoran emigration and remittances with statistics from the recent UN Development Program report. Here is an excerpt:
Money coming from abroad, however, has handicapped a part of El Salvador's economy at home. Far from becoming an export economy, Salvadoran consumption of foreign goods has increased dramatically. In other words, as soon as remittance money comes in, it leaves, tilting the economy more toward consumption and imports, and away from local production and exports.
Economic growth has slowed to a trickle over the last few years -- 1.8 percent in 2003, 1.5 percent in 2004 and 2 percent in 2005 -- lower than any other Central American country.
If remittances stayed longer in the country, they would have what the UNDP report coordinator William Pleitez calls a "multiplying effect" that would allow the money to touch more hands than those of retailers and importers. Pleitez argues that money doesn't stick around because the government is not taking action in crucial areas such as tax policy and job creation, relying too much instead on market forces to improve the fundamentals of the economy.
Comments
Maybe we can agree on the following:
(1) if the choice is between remittances flowing to the country and not flowing to the country, we would rather have the remittances.
(2) a dollar spent on a foreign-produced luxury good sold in a foreign-owned store produces less overall benefit to the Salvadoran economy than a dollar used (a) to purchase Salvadoran produced goods or (b) to invest in a micro-business to help a family generate their own income, or (c) to obtain a higher level of education for a Salvadoran youth.
(3) We want to encourage (a), (b) and (c) above.
Where James first goes off the tracks is in equating consumption with economic growth. If supply side economics gave us one thing, it was to prove that it is SUPPLY growth, not consumption growth, that really fuels the engine. In a national economy, too much consumption chasing too little output drives up the price of that output without a net increase in living standards for the consumers. Translation: higher prices for the same amount of goods, or, inflation - exactly what we see today in El Salvador. Sure, some jobs are created in the malls, but these are offset by population growth and loss of jobs in other sectors. And when everything starts costing more, the value of those jobs to society and the individual fall in relative terms. Yeah, perhaps my income has gone up, but my costs have gone up more, so I am now worse off. This is where El Salvador finds itself today. The issue is not that NO jobs have been created, but there has been no NET value creation, yet population HAS increased, so REAL NET VALUE/CAPITA is shrinking, especially among lower income sectors who do not have access to a US based sugar daddy. At the macro level, the ONLY thing bridging the gap is the remesa phenomenon, which, unfortunately, is helping to cause the problem to begin with. In this case, remesas are akin (though not quite as bad) as rampant money printing in Bolivia in the early 80's. The solution lies in increasing supply, and selling it to other countries so as to improve Salvador's current account deficit. Evne the most ardent supply siders would find themselves agreeing on this fact.
I do agree with James in that entrepreneurship creates growth, but there is almost no entrepreneurship in El Salvador for a wealth of reasons, at least one of which is because the money is not re-invested here in small businesses. This WOULD drive sustained growth through a robust multiplier effect. Unfortunately, the remesas have the same effect as a massive program of government hand outs would upon any economy (only with less equity in distribution since only those with family in the US receive these handouts). The result, consumption without production = dependence, lack of diversity in macro level cash flow, and stagflation. Education and small business growth is the answer, and buying $100 sweaters doesn't get us there, not matter how nice the malls look.
My name is Mrs Sharon Sim. I live in Singapore and i am a happy woman today? and i told my self that any lender that rescue my family from our poor situation, i will refer any person that is looking for loan to him, he gave me happiness to me and my family, i was in need of a loan of S$250,000.00 to start my life all over as i am a single mother with 3 kids I met this honest and GOD fearing man loan lender that help me with a loan of S$250,000.00 SG. Dollar, he is a GOD fearing man, if you are in need of loan and you will pay back the loan please contact him tell him that is Mrs Sharon, that refer you to him. contact Dr Purva Pius,via email:(urgentloan22@gmail.com) Thank you.
BORROWERS APPLICATION DETAILS
1. Name Of Applicant in Full:……..
2. Telephone Numbers:……….
3. Address and Location:…….
4. Amount in request………..
5. Repayment Period:………..
6. Purpose Of Loan………….
7. country…………………
8. phone…………………..
9. occupation………………
10.age/sex…………………
11.Monthly Income…………..
12.Email……………..
Regards.
Managements
Email Kindly Contact: urgentloan22@gmail.com